Can science and the humanities both be right about “identity”?
Volumes have been written about identity by the humanities without arriving at a satisfactory conclusion. There is no need to regurgitate the arguments. They are now redundant because science can define the term at the personal level and the group level.
The gauntlet has been thrown down. The scientific definition stands for “identity” in all its forms … OR … the humanities have to come up with something better. It is a zero-sum game. One side must relinquish their views.
For the scientific view of identity have a look at the above article …
Can science define our identity?